How to read this comparison
Three things decide whether a leak-removal service is worth it, and we weight them in this order:
- What it actually does. Finding (how many sites, Telegram included?), takedowns (how many, how fast), and search de-indexing (getting the leak out of Google, not just off the host).
- Public track record. A service with hundreds of real reviews has a reputation to protect. One with almost none is a bet, however good the marketing. We treat review count as a filter, not a detail.
- Price against your situation. Flat-rate vs. per-stage-name changes the math completely depending on how many names you run.
The comparison
| Service | Price (at time of writing) | What's included | Public reviews | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rulta | ~$109/mo, per stage name | Scanning 200M+ sites, search de-indexing in 20+ countries, weekly manual searches, daily reports, dedicated support | Trustpilot 4.7/5 (~147) | Verify current offer |
| BranditScan | Flat-rate, unlimited takedowns | Facial recognition, hourly monitoring 72k+ sites, unlimited DMCA takedowns, Google delisting, live chat, real-time dashboard | Trustpilot 4.3/5 (~70) | Verify current offer |
| Ceartas | Quote-based | Platform partnerships (Google, TikTok, Cloudflare, OnlyFans), VIP Telegram monitoring, 75M+ sites, dashboard | Limited public reviews | Quote-based |
| CopyrightShark | Budget | Facial recognition + manual verification, daily scans 12k+ sites, live dashboard | Few public reviews | Verify current offer |
| OnlyGuard | Free manual tier; paid from ~$95/mo | 72k+ sites, Google delisting, human support, deepfake handling | Limited public reviews | Free manual tier |
| Bruqi | From ~$29/mo | Automated filing, 6 scan methods, DIY guides | Limited public reviews | Free monthly scan |
| Privly | $49/mo flat, all usernames | Monitoring 10k+ sites plus Telegram/Discord/Reddit, human-reviewed filing, 24-48h median takedown | Newer, fewer reviews | 7-day free trial |
Prices and trials change often; check each provider's current page before deciding. External sources: Rulta on Trustpilot, BranditScan on Trustpilot.
The short verdicts
Rulta, what we use. The most-reviewed name in the space (4.7 across ~147 reviews), mature automation, strong search de-indexing. The catch is honest: pricing is per stage name, so if you run several, it adds up fast, and its focus leans toward de-listing from search over chasing every source host. For us, the track record and reliability justify the cost, because we would rather overpay than explain to a creator why a leak stayed up.
BranditScan, the flat-rate allrounder. Unlimited takedowns at a flat price plus facial recognition make it the most predictable option for a creator with multiple names or heavy leak volume, and a solid 4.3 rating backs it. If per-name pricing is what makes Rulta expensive for you, this is the first alternative to look at.
Ceartas, built for agencies. Platform partnerships and VIP Telegram monitoring are real advantages at high volume, but the quote-based pricing and thinner public review trail mean you are buying on a sales call, not a track record.
Privly, the flat-rate newcomer. $49 flat for all usernames with a free trial and published takedown times is genuinely creator-friendly pricing. The honest caveat is age: fewer reviews and less history than the established names.
Budget options (CopyrightShark, OnlyGuard, Bruqi). Cheaper, and for a creator earning modestly or just starting, a reasonable place to begin, especially the ones with a free tier or scan. The trade-off is consistent across all of them: thin public reviews and, on the fully automated ones, no real person to help when a takedown is bounced or contested. Try them where the budget demands it, with eyes open.
Our honest take
We pay for Rulta because our model is "best option, our creators come first," and at our volume the cost is worth the reliability. That is not automatically the right answer for an individual creator. If you run one name and watch your spend, a flat-rate service like BranditScan or Privly may give you more removal per euro, and a free trial lets you test before committing. The rule that does hold for everyone: favor services with real public reviews, and be skeptical of any tool that is all marketing and no track record.
Or skip the decision entirely
Choosing a tool, setting it up, filing the gaps it misses and handling counter-notices is ongoing work. For the creators we manage, we take all of it off the table: we run the tools, add manual removal on top, and keep leaks down as part of the service, so you never compare a pricing page again. How our leak removal works, and how to sign up.
Questions creators ask
What is the best OnlyFans leak removal service?
By public track record, Rulta leads (4.7 across ~147 reviews) and it is what we use. For flat-rate value with facial recognition, BranditScan is the strongest alternative. The best for you depends on how many names you run and your budget, which is exactly what the comparison above is for.
Do leak removal services offer free trials?
Some do: Privly offers a 7-day free trial, Bruqi a free monthly scan, OnlyGuard a free manual tier. Others are paid or quote-based from the start. Offers change, so check the current page, and use a trial to test real removal speed before you commit.
Is a cheaper leak removal tool good enough?
For a starting or modest-earning creator, a budget or flat-rate tool can be a reasonable start, especially with a free trial. The two things to check whatever the price: does it de-index from Google, not just remove the host copy, and is there a real person when a takedown is contested.
Should I pay for removal or let an agency handle it?
If leaks, pricing pages and counter-notices are eating time you would rather spend creating, having it handled end to end is the point of management. What that looks like.
Last updated: October 18, 2026